Roadmaps to Situational Awareness
By Mary Beth Brangan and James Heddle, EON
Published on August 23, 2025
Escape from Cognitive Capture
Like the proverbial frogs cozily immersed in the comfy warm liquid of daily existence in our seemingly stable world system, we are dangerously unaware of the gathering perils that are rapidly being brought into operation around us.
This virtual global power and asset grab, or coup, is being perpetrated by identifiable people with names and addresses, working in concert through a vast network of organizations, institutions, and so-called ‘public-private partnerships’ - a euphemism for the on-going seamless fusion of business and government – of which the majority of the world’s population are unaware.
This mass cognitive capture and lack of accurate, wide-spectrum situational awareness makes humans vulnerable to the slow-motion envelopment and enslavement by the new world order being assembled around us by counter evolutionary forces, actors and factions.
Urgent Calls to Awareness
We want to offer links to recent publications we believe are essential for meeting the challenge involved in gaining the accurate wide-spectrum situational awareness we are convinced is called for at this time.
The first is the indispensible OmniWar report by David Hughes and Catherine Austin Fitts in which they explain that,
“…Warfighting strategies, tactics, and weapons have undergone a significant
metamorphosis in the 21st century in comparison with the “hot” wars of centuries past. The term used by scholar David A. Hughes, PhD to describe this phenomenon “Omniwar,” which he defines as war waged “in every conceivable domain” by a transnational ruling class (“the few”) against the rest of humanity (“the many”). Crucially, “the many” do not recognize themselves as targets due to the largely clandestine tactics used and a concerted effort to build in “plausible deniability.”
They offer the following handy-dandy list of the various Vectors of Omniwar Attack that are in play against us:
1. Psychological warfare,
2. Neurological warfare,
3. Electromagnetic warfare, and, indeed, direct attempts to gain control over the brain via the globe- encompassing wireless networkWeaponized healthcare Syringe-injectable self-assembling, self-replicating bio-nano bots controllable via electro-magnetic frequencies
4. The great poisoning via air, water, food via aerosol dispersion in the atmosphere
5. Attacks on the food supply and farmland ownership
6. Financial warfare
7. Information warfare [mass cognitive capture]
8. Law and order weaponized for population control
9. Migration [weaponization of population flows]
10. Subversion of Christianity [and all familiar, traditional value systems] as societal ethical bases;
11. Entertainment industry capture;
12. Weather modification and geo-engineering [weaponization of weather];
13. War on children – inoculations, masking, social distancing, suspicion of others as ‘germ carriers,’ global pedophile networks, [human and organ trafficking];
14. War on the elderly through the midazolam and remdesivir, euthanasia measures [weaponization of the ‘health care’ system];
15. Network Centric Warfare – Weaponization of social relationships;
16. Targeting the Brain – via implanted chips and directed EMF energy;
17. Engineering Human Beings – Transhumanism as eugenics by another name;
18. The Internet of Bio-Nano Things via the globe-encompassing wireless network;
GloballGrab.com
The second link is about financial warfare via the weaponization of asset management and value storage: Tokenized, Inc: BlackRock’s Plan To Own The Fractionalized World, by Mark Goodwin and by Whitney Webb, who explain,
“In the aftermath of the recent Bitcoin ETF approvals, BlackRock’s Larry Fink revealed that soon everything will be “ETF’d” and tokenized, threatening to fractionalize not just existing assets and commodities, but the natural world, reducing most living things into Wall Street financial products to be traded on a single, universal ledger.”
If the terms ‘asset storage,’ ‘Bitcoin ETFs,’ ‘dollar-denominated’, ‘ULTSOs’, ‘HTLCs’, ‘tokenized assets’ and ‘ERUS’ are unknown to you, mapping this landscape may seem like a pain in the neck. However, in both the individual and societal levels, pains in the neck can be a stimulus to getting our heads on straight, and to a clearer apprehension of what surrounds us.
Founding the First Church of the Last Nukes - Toward A Faith-Based, Dual-Use Nuclear Policy
The third set of links point to a peril unfortunately absent from Fitt’s and Hughes’ otherwise-comprehensive catalog of Omniwar vectors: the triple threat of an attempted public-private ‘nuclear revival’ involving the indivisible matrix of nuclear energy, weapons and radioactive waste production.
A 2014 article from the Union of Concerned Scientists pointed out,
“The 2011 accident at Fukushima was a wake-up call reminding the world of the vulnerability of nuclear power plants to natural disasters such as earthquakes and floods.
“However, nature is not the only potential threat to nuclear facilities. They are also inviting targets for sabotage and terrorist attacks. A successful attack on a nuclear plant could have devastating consequences, killing, sickening or displacing large numbers of residents in the area surrounding the plant, and causing extensive long-term environmental damage.”
Back in 2016 Karl Grossman elaborated,
“Pre-deployed weapons of mass destruction…. Nuclear power plants are sitting ducks for terrorists. With most positioned along bays and rivers because of their need for massive amounts of coolant water, they provide a clear shot. They are fully exposed for aerial strikes.
“The consequences of such an attack could far outweigh the impacts of 9/11….”
Grossman concluded:
“All 438 nuclear power plants around the world today could—and should—close now. The insignificant amount of electricity they generate—but 10 percent of total electric use—can be provided by other sources.
“And green energy makes for a less costly power and a far safer world in comparison to catastrophic-danger prone and unnecessary nuclear power. We must welcome energy we can live with and reject power that presents a deadly threat in so many ways.”
The third set of links point to a peril unfortunately absent from Fitt’s and Hughes’ otherwise-comprehensive catalog of Omniwar vectors: the triple threat of an attempted public-private ‘nuclear revival’ involving the indivisible matrix of nuclear energy, weapons and radioactive waste production.
A 2014 article from the Union of Concerned Scientists pointed out,
“The 2011 accident at Fukushima was a wake-up call reminding the world of the vulnerability of nuclear power plants to natural disasters such as earthquakes and floods.
“However, nature is not the only potential threat to nuclear facilities. They are also inviting targets for sabotage and terrorist attacks. A successful attack on a nuclear plant could have devastating consequences, killing, sickening or displacing large numbers of residents in the area surrounding the plant, and causing extensive long-term environmental damage.”
Back in 2016 Karl Grossman elaborated,
“Pre-deployed weapons of mass destruction…. Nuclear power plants are sitting ducks for terrorists. With most positioned along bays and rivers because of their need for massive amounts of coolant water, they provide a clear shot. They are fully exposed for aerial strikes.
“The consequences of such an attack could far outweigh the impacts of 9/11….”
Grossman concluded:
“All 438 nuclear power plants around the world today could—and should—close now. The insignificant amount of electricity they generate—but 10 percent of total electric use—can be provided by other sources.
“And green energy makes for a less costly power and a far safer world in comparison to catastrophic-danger prone and unnecessary nuclear power. We must welcome energy we can live with and reject power that presents a deadly threat in so many ways.”
Then there are the false claims promulgated about nuclear energy and climate issues.
Why New Large and Small Nuclear Reactors are Not Green by Mark Z. Jacobson explains succinctly the evidenced-based case against a currently much-touted ‘nuclear revival.’ The Stanford University-based Jacobson explains,
“Air pollution, global warming, and energy security are three of the biggest problems facing the world. Many have suggested that new nuclear reactors can help solve these problems. However, due to the long time from planning to operation alone, new reactors are useless for solving any of these problems. This is just one of seven issues with nuclear electricity that illustrate why it can’t be classified as “green.” Developing more clean, renewable energy is a viable solution.”
Professor Jacobson’s nuclear complex rap-sheet includes:
1. Long Planning-to-Operation Time
2. Egregious, Unavoidable Cost Overruns
3. Air Pollution and Global Warming From Ongoing Routine Nuclear Emissions
4. Weapons Proliferation Risk – “The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) states, with “robust evidence and high agreement,” that “barriers to and risks associated with an increasing use of nuclear energy include…nuclear weapons proliferation concerns…”
5. Meltdown Risks
6. Radioactive Waste Risks and Costs – “Consumed fuel rods from nuclear reactors are radioactive waste. Most rods are stored near the reactor that used them. This has given rise to hundreds of radioactive waste sites that must be maintained for at least 200,000 years. The more nuclear waste that accumulates, the greater the risk of a leak that damages water supply, crops, animals, and/or humans.
7. Mining Lung Cancer Risk [For mainly indigenous and low-income Hispanic populations.]
Jacobson summarizes,
“In sum, new nuclear takes seven to twenty-one years longer, costs two to 6.2 times as much, and emits nine to thirty-seven times the pollution per unit of electricity as new wind or solar. Beyond simply not being “green,” nuclear energy also has weapons proliferation risks, meltdown risks, waste risks, and mining lung cancer risks, which clean renewables avoid. SMRs will continue most of these problems and increase the risk of proliferation.
“In 2024, China added 378 gigawatts of wind, solar, and hydropower, ninety-five times the nuclear power it finished. Thus, even where nuclear is growing fastest, renewables are beating it by two orders of magnitude.
“Finally, many existing reactors are so costly, their owners are demanding subsidies to stay open. But subsidizing existing nuclear may increase carbon emissions and costs versus replacing the plants with wind or solar.”
See also the Sierra Club Fact Sheet, “How Nuclear Power Worsens Climate Change.”
These invaluable pieces help make the emerging, encroaching, invisible matrix of mass manipulation more visible to those with the eyes and fortitude to see The Great What’s Really What.
Accurate situational awareness furthers.